<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Georgia Towers LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gatowers.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gatowers.com</link>
	<description>A tagline goes here</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/26/26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/26/26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCleskey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Document Deposit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/26/26/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe style="margin-left:20px;background-color:#6699FF;overflow-x:hidden;" id="file_upload_iframe" name="file_upload_iframe" src="https://www.yousendit.com/v1/ibox.php?sitebox=1041291&#038;sh=f2b64d933281582c99cd2e0619163d17&#038;send_notification=true&#038;custom_redirect=true" style="display:block;" width="350" height="180" marginwidth="0" align="middle" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/26/26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With OSHA&#8217;s resources taxed, tower companies, individuals are policing free climbing violations</title>
		<link>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/24/with-oshas-resources-taxed-tower-companies-individuals-are-policing-free-climbing-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/24/with-oshas-resources-taxed-tower-companies-individuals-are-policing-free-climbing-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCleskey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tie off]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tower Climbing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatowers.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article copied from Wireless Estimator:
August 22, 2008 - Continuing education about the dangers and the resulting deaths caused by free climbing is believed to have reduced the high fatality rate of workers falling from an elevated structure, but there are many climbers nationwide that continue to recklessly ignore adhering to 100% fall protection requirements.
In an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Article copied from <a title="Wireless Estimator" href="http://www.wirelessestimator.com/t_content.cfm?pagename=Breaking%20News" target="_blank">Wireless Estimator</a>:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">August 22, 2008 - Continuing education about the dangers and the resulting deaths caused by free climbing is believed to have reduced the high fatality rate of workers </span><a href="http://www.wirelessestimator.com/videos/Free%20Climbing%20On%20Tower.wmv" target="blank"></a><span style="font-family: Arial;">falling from an elevated structure, but there are many climbers nationwide that continue to recklessly ignore adhering to 100% fall protection requirements.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial;">In an effort to reduce free climbing, stem fatalities and ensure that tower workers maintain 100% tie off, field personnel of some of the major tower owners are taking a proactive role in ensuring that violators are identified.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">A number of them have photographed or videoed free climbing activities on their competitors&#8217; structures and have contacted the owner of the tower to alert them to the crew members&#8217; careless disregard for safety, requesting that they too be accorded the same courtesy if free climbing is observed on any of their structures.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">One tower owner company is taking their employees&#8217; documentation of a violation on another company&#8217;s site to decide whether they will allow continuance of the  <a href="http://www.gatowers.com/wp-admin/t_content.cfm?pagename=tower technician"></a>contractor&#8217;s work on their towers.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">Individual tower workers and employees of management companies are also becoming vigilant in letting companies know of violations on their sites.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">&#8220;Ideally, the thing to do is to contact OSHA, but the chances of them showing up on time are slim,&#8221; said one Milwaukee project manager. &#8220;But the alternative is to get those companies kicked off approved vendors&#8217; lists and put the word out about the company or at least the individuals,&#8221; he said.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">An OSHA official informed WirelessEstimator.com last month that inspections on wireless construction job sites are not at the level that they would like to see and &#8220;it is unlikely that you will ever see a crackdown targeting the tower construction industry. We just don&#8217;t have the resources,&#8221; he said.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;"><em>Tower Climbers Hall of Shame</em> candidates were captured last week on a <a href="http://www.wirelessestimator.com/videos/Free%20Climbing%20On%20Tower.wmv" target="_blank">video taken in South Carolina</a> . A site supervisor noticed the free climbing and filmed it a thousand feet away through his rear view mirror. The owner of the tower, one of the two largest companies in the industry, has been notified of the incident.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">A <a href="http://www.wirelessestimator.com/t_content.cfm?pagename=Tower%20Technician" target="_blank">photograph was taken</a>  in upstate New York earlier this month by a retired tower technician who said that he is still concerned about the number of people that do not tie off. He said that the two men on the tower noticed that he was photographing them, but they continued to free climb on the carrier-owned site.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">A safety director for one of the nation&#8217;s largest tower consolidators said that he believes that it might be advantageous to the industry if the major tower owners would get together to specifically identify companies that have had numerous violations. However, he said that he wasn&#8217;t aware of what the legal considerations might be and preferred not to comment.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica;">If you have any <em>Tower Climbers Hall of Shame</em> candidates, send them to <a href="mailto:info@wirelessestimator.com">info@wirelessestimator.com</a> , but more importantly, let the tower owner know about the serious safety infractions that you observed</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/24/with-oshas-resources-taxed-tower-companies-individuals-are-policing-free-climbing-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.wirelessestimator.com/videos/Free%20Climbing%20On%20Tower.wmv" length="12702425" type="video/x-ms-wmv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Careers</title>
		<link>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/21/careers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/21/careers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCleskey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatowers.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Georgia Towers, LLC is seeking applicants for the following positions:
    *Field Operations Tech/Mgr
    *Site Acquisition Agents
    *Project Managers
Please submit your resume to careers@gatowers.com for consideration.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.gatowers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/georgia-towers-logo.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-29" title="georgia-towers-logo" src="http://www.gatowers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/georgia-towers-logo-450x260.jpg" alt="" width="402" height="169" /></a></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Georgia Towers, LLC is seeking applicants for the following positions:</span></span></p>
<p>    *Field Operations Tech/Mgr<br />
    *Site Acquisition Agents<br />
    *Project Managers</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Please submit your resume to <a title="mailto:careers@gatowers.com" href="mailto:careers@gatowers.com"><span style="color: #0000ff;">careers@gatowers.com</span></a> for consideration.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/08/21/careers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tower Climbing: Deadliest Job in the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/07/15/tower-climbing-deadliest-job-in-the-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/07/15/tower-climbing-deadliest-job-in-the-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCleskey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatowers.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Tower climbing: deadliest job in U.S.
Tie or die, OSHA head says




By Jeffrey Silva
Source: RCR News

Despite ongoing government and industry efforts to improve safety, maintenance of mobile-phone and other communications towers continues to be the most hazardous work around. And because of the relatively small number of employees in the business compared to other industry sectors, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cr_artbody"></p>
<div class="cr_headline_18px"><strong>Tower climbing: deadliest job in U.S</strong>.</div>
<div class="cr_body"><strong>Tie or die, OSHA head says</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 8px;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 8px;">
</div>
<p><span class="cr_bluelinks" style="color: #000099;">By <a href="mailto:jsilva@crain.com">Jeffrey Silva</a></span><br />
Source: <a href="http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080709/FREE/539166731" target="_blank">RCR News</a></p>
<p></span></p>
<p><span class="cr_artbody">Despite ongoing government and industry efforts to improve safety, maintenance of mobile-phone and other communications towers continues to be the most hazardous work around. And because of the relatively small number of employees in the business compared to other industry sectors, tower climbing — which suffered five fatalities during a 12-day span this spring and seven deaths overall this year so far — may also be the most overlooked, deadly job in the country.</p>
<p>The recent spike in tower fall fatalities follows a reprieve in deaths between early December and April. It was a very bad year in 2006, when 18 tower workers lost their lives. The tower fatalities come during continued growth and expansion in the wireless industry, which is in the midst of another phase of infrastructure construction with the infusion into the market of more spectrum for 3G, WiMAX and other wireless services.</p>
<p>According to WirelessEstimator.com, an online resource for the tower industry that tracks tower accidents, at least half of this year’s fatalities were linked to AT&amp;T Mobility projects. However, it remains unclear whether any association can be drawn between the uptick in tower industry deaths and the current era of 3G network buildout.</p>
<p>“The recent spate of accidents must be viewed as an industry-wide cause for concern, both on the carrier and climber levels,” said Craig Lekutis, president of WirelessEstimator and a former tower industry manager. “There were too many deaths in too limited a period of time. However, it would be difficult to try to define a trend, such as the rush to deploy 3G based upon seven fatalities.”</p>
<p>Lekutis added: “There are a number of data limitations that hinder comparison and analysis, but one thing is clear, the majority of these deadly falls would not have happened if the climber had been tied off 100% of the time. It appears that all of the tower technicians that died had the appropriate personal protection equipment available to them. They just didn’t use it properly.”</p>
<p>Tower fall fatalities have grabbed the attention of the Bush administration.</p>
<p>“Tower climbing remains the most dangerous job in America,” said Edwin Foulke Jr., head of the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration, in prepared remarks for the annual conference of the <a href="http://www.rcr<a href="http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080212/FREE/77629089">Tower Erectors</a> earlier this year in Nashville. It was the second straight year Foulke addressed the group.</p>
<p>“The majority of fatalities are the result of climbers not being tied off to a safe anchorage point at all times or relying upon faulty personal protection equipment,” Foulke stated. “Many fatalities have occurred during the erection, retrofitting or dismantling of a tower. ‘Tie or Die!’ has become synonymous with the requirement for 100% fall protection.”</p>
<p>“OSHA is conducting investigations of the tower deaths that have occurred in federal OSHA states,” OSHA said in a statement to RCR Wireless News, adding that offices in Jackson, Miss., and San Antonio were currently investigating recent tower accidents.</p>
<p>OSHA has partnered with NATE to develop training programs to improve workplace safety and to increase awareness among wireless providers, tower companies and general contractors about occupational dangers as well as addressing them.</p>
<p>“If there’s one [death], that’s too many,” said Patrick Howey, executive director of NATE. “It really comes down to we want to eliminate all fatalities.”</p>
<p>Howey said key stakeholders in the tower supply chain — tower owners, cellular carriers and general contractors — have to be focused on safety to improve the status quo. “We could like for them to look at safety as the only way to do the job.”</p>
<p>On June 2, NATE held a Web cast safety tailgate talk with Chairman Don Doty. The event is part of the association’s ‘It’s Up to You’ campaign. The Web cast can be replayed at natehome.com.</p>
<p>But the group’s strong emphasis on safety may not be enough to reduce the fatality rate of tower climbers. The OSHA-NATE tower safety guidelines are voluntary. Though OSHA has some construction safety regulations that are applicable to tower climbers, there are no comprehensive federal regulations specific to the tower industry. North Carolina has statewide tower safety rules, and Michigan is considering adopting a tower safety standard as well.</p>
<p>“Although I can’t underscore their importance enough, we have to be careful that we don’t become over-dependent upon tailgate sessions to address the problem,” stated WirelessEstimator’s Lekutis. “Best-practices safety standards are important and, although their fatality reduction results can’t be accurately measured, it’s clear that they do provide a greater awareness of the problem and the tools to help in saving lives. NATE has done an excellent job in promulgating these standards.”</p>
<p><span class="cr_red">Labor union arguments </span></p>
<p>Michael <span class="cr_red">ssor of industrial relations in the Departments of Economics and Interdisciplinary Studies at Wayne State University, and organized labor argues tower safety is hurt by the lack of unionization in a business where general contractors subcontract work to smaller firms that may lack training, proper equipment or English language fluency.</p>
<p>“It’s clear when you do training for the non-union side it doesn’t stick,” said Belzer.</p>
<p>Labor union safety specialists point out there is an inherent pressure to complete work on schedule, or better yet ahead of deadline, with financial incentives offered for getting work completed sooner rather than later. There are also financial pressures, especially in the current economic downturn. A worker without union representation, according to labor experts, is more likely than an employee affiliated with organized labor to agree to work at an unsafe site because of fear of losing work. They also said there is a lack of legal liability and accountability for companies that hire general contractors which in turn subcontract out work.</p>
<p>Indeed, a loophole in OSHA guidelines finds tower owners and cellular carriers free of blame when a tower accident occurs. OSHA enforcement kicks in when there is an employer-employee relationship. But if the owner is not on-site and is not controlling the employees — a scenario common in tower construction — OSHA cannot hold tower owners or wireless providers liable. As such, it is usually a small subcontractor that is fined when OSHA determines a safety violation has occurred. However, in some cases families of deceased tower workers have filed lawsuits targeting wireless providers and tower companies. AT&amp;T Mobility, Sprint Sites U.S.A and American Tower L.P. are ensnarled in tower fatality-related litigation.</p>
<p>In 2000, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health said that from 1992 to 1997, nearly 100 workers died from falls and other injuries related to tower construction. Sixteen tower construction workers died on the job in 2003, according to an OSHA. NIOSH estimated at that time the risk for fatal injuries among telecom tower workers ranges from 49 to 468 injury-related deaths per 100,000 employees, compared with about five deaths per 100,000 employees in all other U.S. industries.</p>
<p>David LeGrande, director of occupational safety and health at the Communications Workers of America, said the fatality rate in the tower industry is especially alarming in view the relatively few deaths in the telecom industry generally.</p>
<p>“The only way this can be done [improving tower safety] is by passage of [federal] regulations,” said LeGrande. “It’s no wonder there are as many fatalities as there are.”</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/07/15/tower-climbing-deadliest-job-in-the-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter of Recommendation</title>
		<link>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/06/11/letter-of-recommendation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/06/11/letter-of-recommendation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCleskey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Recommendations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatowers.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To Whom It May Concern:
Crown Castle has worked with Georgia Towers now for the last year in the Virginia and Maryland markets as turn-key contractors.  they perform services from site acquisition through construction.  As the National Site Development Manager for the Northeast, it has been a pleasure working with this group.  Their level of customer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Whom It May Concern:</p>
<p>Crown Castle has worked with Georgia Towers now for the last year in the Virginia and Maryland markets as turn-key contractors.  they perform services from site acquisition through construction.  As the National Site Development Manager for the Northeast, it has been a pleasure working with this group.  Their level of customer service and expertise has been exceptional.  Their local market groups are highly experienced and diligent.  Crown has undertaken an enormous project with one of our clients consisting of over 55 build to suit tower sites and growing.  The success and growth of this project has been directly attributed to th knowledgeable experienced staff that Georgia Towers assembled.  The client has been so pleased with the work performed, that they have chosen to continue to assign more projects to Crown toward their 2008 build plan.</p>
<p>The Georgia Tower group has interfaced seamlessly with, our client&#8217;s processes and procedures as well as Crown&#8217;s; this is no simple task considering the complexity of both our organizations.  They continue to grow their staff to meet our changing needs with highly qualified local market personnel and continue to out perform similar organizations that have been working in the markets for years.</p>
<p>Because of their superior performance Crown has given them exclusive rights to operate in these markets as our agents.  They represent Crown as though they were long time Crown employees, with Crown&#8217;s best interest in mind at all times.  Their diligence and work ethic is second to none, I could not have done a better job myself.</p>
<p>I would highly recommend Georgia towers to any client in need of a turn-key contractor for all related services to the wireless industry.  I have worked exclusively in the wireless industry now for over 20 years and it is rare that I have found a contractor that I would personally recommend to anyone with this much confidence.</p>
<p>Bill Gorgone<br />
Crown Castle International<br />
National Site Development Manager/Northeast<br />
New Castle, DE Office<br />
Phone (302) 419-2072</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/06/11/letter-of-recommendation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon Wireless to acquire Alltel</title>
		<link>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/06/09/official-verizon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/06/09/official-verizon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCleskey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatowers.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s official: Verizon Wireless to acquire Alltel and become nation’s largest
Combined carrier would have more than 80 million subscribers

By Mike Dano
Source: RCR Wireless News
Hours after media reports indicated a deal was close, Verizon Wireless announced an agreement to acquire Alltel Communications L.L.C.for $5.9 billion in cash and assume $22.2 billion in debt, for a total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="cr_body"><strong>It’s official: Verizon Wireless to acquire Alltel and become nation’s largest<br />
Combined carrier would have more than 80 million subscribers</strong><span style="line-height: 8px;"><br />
</span></div>
<p><span class="cr_bluelinks" style="color: #000099;">By <a href="mailto:mdano@crain.com">Mike Dano</a></span><br />
Source: <a href="http://www.rcrnews.com" target="_blank">RCR Wireless News</a></p>
<p><span class="cr_artbody">Hours after media reports indicated a deal was close, Verizon Wireless announced an agreement to acquire Alltel Communications L.L.C.for $5.9 billion in cash and assume $22.2 billion in debt, for a total package price of $28.1 billion. If approved, the deal would create the nation’s largest carrier with more than 80 million customers.</span></p>
<p>Verizon Wireless said it expects to immediately save $9 billion through the deal thanks to “reduced capital and operating expense savings.” The carrier said it would save around $1 billion in “incremental cost savings” in the second year after the agreement closes.</p>
<p>Many in the industry have long expected such a transaction. Both Verizon Wireless and Alltel operate CDMA networks, and both recently announced plans to upgrade their networks to Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology, a 4G standard that promises faster data connections.</p>
<p>Further, Alltel and Verizon Wireless both use Qualcomm Inc.’s BREW application download service.</p>
<p>For Verizon Wireless, the agreement would give the carrier a significantly larger customer base as well as a broader network reach. Alltel serves more than 13 million customers in markets in 34 states, which includes 57 primarily rural markets that Verizon Wireless does not serve.</p>
<p>For Alltel, the deal serves to erase the pressure of competing with nationwide carriers in a market that is becoming fiercely competitive on price, technology, handsets and marketing.</p>
<p>And the deal, if approved, has wide-ranging implications for the national and international wireless community. A combined Verizon Wireless-Alltel would offer major new opportunities for handset and network vendors, and would create an even larger player that has so far made it a point to be at the forefront of technology and policy issues.</p>
<p>But Verizon Wireless’ competitors will likely take the brunt of the carrier’s new deal. AT&amp;T Mobility, T-Mobile USA Inc. and Sprint Nextel Corp., along with a range of smaller players, will have to position themselves for a carrier that is already highly successful, and may become more so. Alltel also serves as a primary roaming partner with major operators as it operates both CDMA and GSM networks in rural markets not typically served by the nationwide operators.</p>
<p>But Verizon Wireless could face significant challenges in attempting to finalize its acquisition of Alltel. Federal authorities are sure to carefully consider antitrust concerns. For instance, Alltel was forced to divest some properties in southern Minnesota following its acquisition of Western Wireless Corp. in 2006. Those markets were eventually acquired by Rural Cellular Corp., which Verizon Wireless is now in the process of acquiring.</p>
<p>If the deal is consummated it would cap an eventful year for Verizon Wireless. The carrier inked a $2.67 billion deal to acquire Rural Cellular (although the deal has not yet been <a href="http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080301/SUB/688184920">approved</a>), it earlier this year paid $9.4 billion for <a href="http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=700MHzwhoswinning">700 MHz spectrum</a> in the Federal Communications Commission’s auction, and announced plans to both <a href="http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071201/SUB/71201021">open</a> its network to devices and applications from other suppliers as well as <a href="http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080404/SUB/581566019">upgrade</a> its network to Long Term Evolution technology.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Verizon Wireless’ purchase of Alltel has precedent, both good and bad. AT&amp;T Corp. purchased Cingular Wireless L.L.C. for $41 billion, a deal that many have hailed as successful, while Sprint Corp. acquired Nextel Communications Inc. for $35 billion, an expense the carrier recently had to write off as largely a failure.</p>
<p>Verizon Wireless’ stock was up more than 5% on the news to around $39 per share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gatowers.com/2008/06/09/official-verizon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
